We are rethinking our approach to the process and staffing of infrastructure functions like:
Methodology development
Centralized Project Repositories
Status / Risk Reporting
Service Offering Definition
Common Tools / Utilities
Solutions Buildout
etc, etc
We have been delivering these items from a centralized team, but in many ways I think a “rotating personnel” approach might be more
effective, in that the people who are actually delivering the Services will help drive the infrastructure and process. On the other hand, a
rotating staffing model for the development of these centralized deliverables might lead to lack of consistency in the deliverables.
How are others staffing and running the groups that develop these infrastructural elements in your organizations?
|